Atheists are quick to say that “religion has been the cause of wars and atrocities”. What exactly are they trying to say? Hasn’t lack of religion ever started a war?
With this statement, the Atheist is trying to make the case that because man has used religion as a cause for war, it should be dispensed with. However, this does not necessarily follow. Do you see the problem? (The logical fallacy here is appeal to emotion).
Let’s turn the argument around: The lack of religion has been the cause of wars and atrocities.
You see? Men start wars for non-religious reasons as well. Thus, perhaps it is rather Atheism that should be dispensed with because Atheists start wars and commit atrocities?
The Atheist may cede here that men of both religious and irreligious backgrounds start wars (who can disagree with that?). However, the Atheist may still claim that the number killed in the name of religion is far greater than any killed for any irreligious purpose. Is it that a fact? Let’s take a look at some of the atrocities committed by men who did not have religion as their motive:
The atrocities committed by the Japanese during WWII are well documented. You can browse the category on Wikipedia with a list of them all (though I recommend against it as it is quite horrible) here.
Joseph Stalin is responsible for conservatively 20 million Russian deaths during his reign.
How many millions of people were persecuted, lost everything, or lost their lives during this terrible time? Wikipedia counts 36 million people persecuted and 1 million killed.
Pol Pot killed conservatively 2 million people in his attempt to “cleanse” Cambodia.
So if we want to go by the numbers, history is certainly very clear that motives that were not religious have done a lot of evil in the world.
Interestingly enough, one of the first targets of many evils in the world is the Roman Catholic Church. Christians are often the first to be persecuted by men in power.
Let’s be fair to religion here. It is religion, especially Christianity, that calls men to forgive their enemies. Do not blame religion, blame the men who do not live up to it. (I’ll leave aside the outlier case were someone to make “war” a part of their “religion”. It should go without saying that this is not the case I am here referring to).
Religion is a belief system that defines morality. The Atheist also has a belief system for defining their morality. Men on both sides of this debate are going to (and have) started wars. The Atheist may here claim that “when Atheists start wars it is for rational reasons, the religious for irrational”. Tell me, what exactly is rational about the atrocities listed above?
If Atheists think that Theists are the only ones who kill people, then they’ve apparently forgotten about a lot of wars and atrocities in the world.
Jesus Christ calls us to forgive our enemies, and to pray for those who persecute us. What does the Atheist say about his enemies and those who persecute him? At least Christians are called by the head of the church to lead a life of forgiveness. If they don’t live up to it, we can only fault the follower, not the faith.